Published by Lois Lame, SSALRCYTMVDQJCP & Assistant Editor
If it's Saturday, it's time for another Patsy Cline song. This week, we're posting a YouTube clip of Patsy singing "I Fall To Pieces" on "The Glenn Reeves Show" way back on February 23, 1963 .....
Saturday, August 14, 2010
Patsy Cline - "I Fall To Pieces"
Photo Of The Day - Saturday, 8/14/2010
Published by Lois Lame, SSALRCYTMVDQJCP & Assistant Editor
"County Commission Meeting, 6/24/2010"
Photo taken by Dick Schaefer using expensive NOKIA cellphone.
Reproductions available: Unframed prints @ $10. Framed prints @ $20.
Copyright protected 2010. All rights reserved.
Laugh Of The Day - Saturday, 8/14/2010
Published by Lois Lame, SSALRCYTMVDQJCP & Assistant Editor
Part 2/3, "Call Lehigh 4-9900" .....
Part 2/3, "Call Lehigh 4-9900" .....
Quote Of The Day - Saturday, 8/14/2010
Published by Dick Schaefer, Award-winning, Unpaid, Part-time Contributing Writer and Amateur Investigative Reporter
Date: 8/14/2010
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." ~ First Amendment, Constitution of The United States of America
Commentary - Although our rights to "free expression" are guaranteed under the First Amendment and although we are protected from abusive laws that might otherwise be enacted by the U.S. Congress, state legislatures or local government authorities, our rights to "free expression" will, it seems, always be threatened by those individuals and groups who would seek through means other than the establishment of laws, statutes or ordinances to infringe upon our right to worship as we please, to silence us from expressing our viewpoints, to discourage political dissent and to strip us of effective means to redress grievances with our local, state and federal governments. Challenges to our First Amendment "free expression" rights are most likely to manifest themselve in the form of direct threats, subtle intimidation, lawsuits or threatened lawsuits alleging libel, copyright infringement, religious discrimination, etc., economic pressure in the form of boycotts and negative publicity against our enterprises, improper use of law enforcement agencies to file bogus or frivolous complaints for the purpose of harassment and intimidation and so on and so on. Basically I call these kind of "challenges" to our First Amendment "free expression" rights exactly what they are ....... BULLYING! In order to protect our First Amendment "free expression" rights, we will ALL have to be willing and able to stand up to these BULLIES! We will have to stand vigilant against those who would seek to take away our rights of "free expression" by forcing our conformity with their wishes whatever they may be!
Date: 8/14/2010
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." ~ First Amendment, Constitution of The United States of America
Commentary - Although our rights to "free expression" are guaranteed under the First Amendment and although we are protected from abusive laws that might otherwise be enacted by the U.S. Congress, state legislatures or local government authorities, our rights to "free expression" will, it seems, always be threatened by those individuals and groups who would seek through means other than the establishment of laws, statutes or ordinances to infringe upon our right to worship as we please, to silence us from expressing our viewpoints, to discourage political dissent and to strip us of effective means to redress grievances with our local, state and federal governments. Challenges to our First Amendment "free expression" rights are most likely to manifest themselve in the form of direct threats, subtle intimidation, lawsuits or threatened lawsuits alleging libel, copyright infringement, religious discrimination, etc., economic pressure in the form of boycotts and negative publicity against our enterprises, improper use of law enforcement agencies to file bogus or frivolous complaints for the purpose of harassment and intimidation and so on and so on. Basically I call these kind of "challenges" to our First Amendment "free expression" rights exactly what they are ....... BULLYING! In order to protect our First Amendment "free expression" rights, we will ALL have to be willing and able to stand up to these BULLIES! We will have to stand vigilant against those who would seek to take away our rights of "free expression" by forcing our conformity with their wishes whatever they may be!
Vote Recount Update: Oral Arguments Presented At Hearing On Friday, 8/13
Published by Dick Schaefer, Award-winning, Unpaid, Part-time Contributing Writer and Amateur Investigative Reporter
Date: 8/14/2010
In the case of "Larry Miskel v. Ronald Jost", 20th Circuit Judge, The Honorable Gael D. Wood heard oral arguments by attorneys for both sides between approximately 3 p.m. and approximately 4:30 p.m. Brett J. Hellman, attorney for respondent Ronald Jost, and P. Dennis Barks, attorney for appellant Larry Miskel, were both thorough and professional in their presentations and in their examinations of the two witnesses who were called to testify. The two witnesses called to testify in the case were Larry Miskel, Mayor of Hermann and appellant in the case, and Lesa Lietzow, County Clerk and Overseer of Elections.
Judge Wood informed the litigants that he would take the case under advisement and would render a decision next week.
Date: 8/14/2010
In the case of "Larry Miskel v. Ronald Jost", 20th Circuit Judge, The Honorable Gael D. Wood heard oral arguments by attorneys for both sides between approximately 3 p.m. and approximately 4:30 p.m. Brett J. Hellman, attorney for respondent Ronald Jost, and P. Dennis Barks, attorney for appellant Larry Miskel, were both thorough and professional in their presentations and in their examinations of the two witnesses who were called to testify. The two witnesses called to testify in the case were Larry Miskel, Mayor of Hermann and appellant in the case, and Lesa Lietzow, County Clerk and Overseer of Elections.
Judge Wood informed the litigants that he would take the case under advisement and would render a decision next week.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)